The problem with this publication project is the fact that
there is far too much content, or data, to process. At last count over 800,000
files, documents, photographs, videos, recordings, databases, et al; and, the
digitization process has still not finished (thus far, over 180GB of data).
Diana is now a historic figure, and the under 50 years
of age markets will not understand many of the issues covered in the publications; and indeed,
most people will find it all too boring and too irrelevant in today’s chaotic and
fast-moving world. What one needs is a media output, and commentary, that
would re-gain and capture the popular imagination.
Diana’s problems, mistreatment, and tribulations, have
been covered many times over in print, and the global media; and frankly, the
misery of a poor little rich girl from thirty years ago, pales into
insignificance when one considers the misery of the average man and woman and
child in the streets of 2025. What one needs is media awareness that would encompass
the prevalent topics of 2025, meaning the right to live in a fair society where
nobody is better than anybody else because of the self-appointed or fantasy rights
or privileges of birth or bank balance.
The main market for any English language publication
or media output is the United States. Thus, how does one attract, arguably, 51%
of the reading (or voting) public in the United States? What one needs is media
content that would interest and captivate the average populist in-app and
online purchaser (probably wearing a MAGA cap).
At the same time how does one celebrate and honour
Diana’s undoubted compassion for, and empathy with, the poor and downtrodden
Common Folk? Would Diana not wish to free those Common Folk from their
servitude? What one needs is media output that would capture the
disenfranchised British and American Commoner - and at the same time confound
the grey Westminster and Washington men in their grubby suits.
The disadvantage faced by the Trusts are that they are only copyright holders, they are
not the typical content producers or authors, they have no expertise in writing
such publications, and they certainly have no publishing experience. Furthermore,
the books in question have been written by a number of ghost authors, whom have
long since been paid for their time, and have no further involvement with the
manuscripts. Those books are now having to be updated in order to reflect a
more contemporary context and public awareness. One must provide
some ‘revelations and scoops’ of a type that would be understood and
appreciated by the average American and British reader, in 2025; and, in the
wake of the current trend for the public to support populist ideas and
administrations, some reference to the concerns of those groups.
From the Archive materials, the initial task is to take the existing raw data, evidence,
and manuscripts, that have been produced by the researchers, investigators, and
informers, and then to allow suitably qualified editors to update those
existing manuscripts. Those refreshed manuscripts can then be packaged, and
popularised, by illustrators and video makers; because almost certainly, a
digital output with colour images and videos will be more relevant to today’s
readers than is the static printed book.
What the
Trusts can provide for the new publications and output are suggested new topics
for research, and the necessary research funds. In addition, there will be free
access to the Diana-Forstmann Archives to provide content for the new publications
and media output. The business model would be that the new publications and
media output can also generate remuneration and revenue streams for the
participants.
A list of
contemporary issues and concerns will be generated by advocates and activists,
the likely remedies for those issues and concerns can be considered, and the
appropriate social and political commentaries and actions might be undertaken. That
will produce a list of suggested new publications which will then be available to authors,
surrogate authors, and ghostwriters; and the Trusts will very generously remunerate
them for their time. Those new titles can then by published.
The term ‘Revelations and Scoops’ was introduced to the discussions by one eminent publisher seeking to direct the Trusts into producing a marketable retail product based on newsworthy topics; that definition was renamed as ‘New Titles and Topics’ by the Trust managers in an effort to reduce the sensationalism of the new writing.
Title 1.
The Commonwealth of Britain
Diana, the then
future Queen of the United Kingdom, wanted the British Monarchy abolished, and
for her country to be a democracy like the United States.
Topic 1.1 In 1985 Ronald Regan introduced Diana to Roy
Cohn (the New York attorney), to handle her anticipated affairs in the United
States. It was interesting to note that Diana was already speaking to Regan and Cohn about her escape to America as early as 1985. Cohn was of course also Donald
Trump’s lawyer at the time.
Topic 1.2 Diana first stated the ambition that the
British Monarchy should be abolished in 1988 when the publishing project
started. Diana said that she thought that her elder son would be too
indoctrinated or mesmerized by ‘the Windsor Herd – or gang’ to be saved, but on
occasion Diana suggested that perhaps her younger son might be able to later stand
for election and undertake the role of President of The Commonwealth of Britain.
Topic 1.3 Diana had meetings with, and was working with,
the British politician Tony Benn on his proposed Commonwealth of Britain Bill to abolish the Monarch and introduce a
‘democratic, federal, and secular Commonwealth of Britain’. Benn told Diana
that he wished she would run for office as the first President of the
Commonwealth of Britain; she would certainly have won a popular vote, and have
been elected President. See: The Commonwealth of Britain
Topic 1.4 Diana told Benn that she hoped that one day
her son (Harry) could be elected as the democratic President of The
Commonwealth of Britain.
Topic 1.5 By 1995, Diana had found a potential saviour
in the guise of Ted Forstmann, and she started planning with him to take her two boys to
America to save them from the servitude of being a slave to the Windsor Herd.
Diana was working with politicians in Belgium and France to give her (and her
boys) a safe refuge until she could get legal custody of her children and they
could all move to America.
Topic 1.6 Diana’s legal team was collecting evidence, to
present to a court of law, that would save and protect her children from their
criminal indenture as hereditary slaves to the Windsor Herd, and the Unjust
Enrichment enjoyed by the Windsor Herd in the use of Diana’s children. Evidence
was provided by High Court judges, including Thomas Bingham, Christopher
Sumner, Donald Nicholls, John Knox, Gordon Slynn, John Arnold, John Donaldson,
Robert Goff, and Joyanne Bracewell.
Topic 1.7 Diana was a threat to the British
establishment and her death was allegedly planned, and inevitable.
Title 2. The need for U.S. political control of the
United Kingdom
In recent
years the United Kingdom, as it is now constituted, represents a threat to the
Free World, to the National Security of the United States of America, and to
the business and commerce of the United States. The 1st Trump
administration and the FBI had been aware of these dangers since a report was
produced in 2017.
Topic 2.1 A report submitted and known to the FBI and
White House officials specifically named British politicians and officials in
government as having been in contact with, or influenced by, their Chinese,
Indian, and Russian intelligence agency contacts. Those British politicians included
four British Prime Ministers, some ten British Cabinet Ministers; and, a very
large number of British government officials and civil servants.
Topic 2.2 The United Kingdom is, or was, a de facto
client or subordinate state to the Chinese, Indian, and Russian governments and
their oligarchs. As such the United Kingdom represents a threat to the United
States and the Free World; or so the present (2nd Trump) United
States administration might consider.
Topic 2.3 The United States cannot allow the tribal elites
and robber barons in the United Kingdom to continue to work for undemocratic
and dictatorial states and criminal individuals in return for baksheesh; nor to allow
them to undermine true democracy in the United Kingdom. The United States has a
duty to the people of the United Kingdom, as their kinsfolk, to free them.
Topic 2.4. The United States cannot allow the tribal elites
in the other English-speaking countries, specifically Canada, Australia, and New
Zealand, to undermine the security of the Free World. The United States has a
duty to the people of those countries, as their kinsfolk, to free them.
Title 3.
The need for a U.S. military umbrella over the United Kingdom
The British
people would undoubtedly welcome a plebiscite to determine whether they want
the abolition of the Monarchy in order to become a republic, and/or to become
the 51st State of the United States of America (and Europe). The United States
owe it to the British people to offer them protection, freedom, liberation, and
possibly - confederacy.
Topic 3.1 The submarine based British nuclear missiles
are under the ultimate control of the U.S. government, and there is a Kill
Switch. That Kill Switch is allegedly controlled by an American officer at a
Major or Lieutenant Commander rank. The British have no independent nuclear
deterrent.
Topic 3.2 The American aircraft and weapons systems
supplied to the United Kingdom also allegedly have a Kill Switch that can
disable each aircraft or missile navigation system. The British have no
effective conventional weapons.
Topic 3.3 The Americans already have troops and weapons
stationed in the United Kingdom; and if the British government refuse a
plebiscite, then the American minutemen could seize power in the United Kingdom
and free the Common Folk, and establish a truly democratic government as they
did in 1776.
Topic 3.4 The United Kingdom can provide the protection
of the Eastern Front of the United States if the British military was
completely integrated with, and under the operational control of, the United
States.
Topic 3.5 The United States should reassert itself as
being the leader of the Free World where anybody, irrespective of fantasy birth
titles, class, or wealth, can be the Head of State in a free and democratic
country.
Topic 3.6 The President of the United States could then
campaign for Harry Windsor to either run for office as the first President of
the Commonwealth of Britain, or as the first Governor of the State of Britain
as the 51st State of the United States of America and Europe.
Topic 3.7 Would Harry Windsor consider running for
President in the Commonwealth of Britain, or as Governor of the State of
Britain (the 51st State of the United States of America and Europe)?
Title 4.
The criminality and corruption of the United Kingdom State
What is
newsworthy in the archive data is, for example, the allegations of the systemic
mistreatment and abuse of children by various British State organisations and
individuals connected with the State. All of this has over the years been
covered up by each successive United Kingdom government; and this is evidence
of the democratic failure and the general corruption and criminality of the
British government and the Ministers concerned.
Similarly,
the abuse and disregard of women, the poor and the impoverished, and the sick,
has all been continually covered up.
There is a
long list of such abuse and corruption by British State organisations and
individuals, and there is much evidence in the archive data; and, Diana would have
published that evidence.
The
predominant topic is the helplessness of the average person in the street to
improve their lives, and the incompetence and corruption of the British government and
politicians to allow the people to have a better life.
Title 5.
The U.S. needs to save and protect the English-speaking tribes
A media project is needed to seek the support of the United States for a Confederation of
English-Speaking Democracies to protect the freedom and security of the
English-Speaking Peoples; under the leadership of the United States.
The United
States can offer the English-speaking peoples of the world a simple chance for freedom,
and escape from their tribal elites, their tribal poverty and their increasing deprivation;
and long-term safety and security in an increasingly dangerous and violent
world.
The English-speaking
countries like the United Kingdom, Canada, Australia, New Zealand, et al, under
the leadership of the United States, can come together as the United States of
The World; a fully democratic and emancipated trans-continental republic. Such
a confederation of democracies can ensure the concept of democracy and freedom for
their own people, and an example for the world in general; and, thereby secure
the safety and long-term future not only of the United States, but also that of
the other English-speaking areas of the world.
Each of those
English-speaking countries could hold a Referendum to decide whether to apply
to the United States to become a Federal State within The United States, or to
be an independent republic in a constitutional federation within The United
States of the World.